NoCap-Test evidence · think2earn 3/3 · ≈8.3%
Source code ↗

BottleCapAI NoCap-Test

≈8.3% less first-passage train time than F1_seal (3.866 h) — 3/3 seeds

Carol Calin · acalincarol@gmail.com

Applied Jul 9. Sealed Jul 15–16. Evidence state · 2026-07-16.

NoCap-Test trains GPT-2 ≈124M on FineWeb on one GPU. First-passage train time is the train_time_ms value at the first logged row where val_disjoint ≤ 3.3821. Sliding, EMA, and train-CE curves are diagnostics; they do not define T.

The challenge scores algorithmic ideas, not hyperparameter tuning or wholesale Modded-NanoGPT copies.

We adopt Keller Jordan’s Muon (explainer; published Ortho/NS, not our invention). Plain Muon alone failed or lost under our seal (failure ledger). What we sealed is Muon on a B32 systems path plus timing-cheap split-QKV after a costlier split missed its timing criterion (what QKV is; process glossary). Joint-QKV Muon on the same stack did not first-cross val_disjoint ≤ 3.3821 where measured. Mean ΔT% is ≈+8.3% vs our sealed AdamW F1_seal (3.866 h, explained here): 3/3 seeds. Under our sealed F1 baseline. Public % vs F1_seal only. Matched cand-vs-stock ΔT% = N/A. Sealed trainer + SHA freeze: TRAINER_DELTA · kit/ (this site) · view source ↗.

What the number means

Three seeds first-cross val_disjoint ≤ 3.3821 in 3.51–3.57 h (mean 3.544 h, mean ΔT% ≈ +8.3% vs F1_seal 3.866 h). Terminal candidate CE ≈ 3.37. Per-seed T and ΔT% are in the scoreboard and seeds explainer.

How it is measured

3 / 3
seeds under F1_seal
≈8.3%
mean ΔT% vs F1_seal
3.866 h
F1_seal T_cross
≈3.37
candidate terminal CE

Pin: 1× A100-SXM4-40GB · torch 2.13.0+cu130 · GPT-2 ≈124M · FineWeb · official disjoint val. Workspace codes: Clock-W, Claim-W1, Claim-W2.

Joint-QKV stock never crossed on 1337/2029; seed 4242 stock was not run. The complete claim boundary appears with the first score claim above. Why each clause.